Risk Comparison · Cached SEC Snapshots
AAPL vs LAES — Structural Risk Comparison
AAPL
Apple Inc.
AA
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 100%
VS
LAES
SEALSQ Corp
C
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 22%
STRUCTURAL RISK ANALYSIS · DETERMINISTIC
LAES SHOWS HIGHER STRUCTURAL RISK
LAES has 839.1 fewer months of cash runway (159.9 mo vs 999.0 mo).
METRIC
AAPL
LAES
SPREAD
Doomsday Clock
999.0 mo▲
159.9 mo▼
839.1 mo
Dilution Risk
-1.8 / 100▲
444.2 / 100▼
446.1 pts
Altman Z-Score
2.27▼
15.82▲
13.55
Operating Cash Flow
$82.63B▲
-$31.3M▼
—
Net Income
$71.67B▲
-$34.2M▼
—
Current Ratio
1.07x▼
15.92x▲
—
Retained Earnings
$12.36B▲
-$76.1M▼
—
Contagion Watch
Other tickers the Risk Sentinel just flagged
Is your portfolio hiding a toxic S-3?
Run any ticker through the same Risk Sentinel scan — free.
Educational analysis only. Not financial advice. Comparison uses cached SEC EDGAR data and may contain inaccuracies. AI systems are fallible. Always verify against primary filings on
SEC EDGAR
and consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.