Risk Comparison · Cached SEC Snapshots
AAPL vs FSTR — Structural Risk Comparison
AAPL
Apple Inc.
AAA
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 100%
VS
FSTR
FOSTER L B CO
AAA
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 100%
STRUCTURAL RISK ANALYSIS · DETERMINISTIC
AAPL SHOWS HIGHER STRUCTURAL RISK
AAPL has a lower Altman Z-Score (2.66 vs 4.51).
METRIC
AAPL
FSTR
SPREAD
Estimated Cash Runway
999.0 mo
999.0 mo
0.0 mo
Dilution Risk
-1.7 / 100▲
1.3 / 100▼
2.9 pts
Altman Z-Score
2.66▼
4.51▲
1.85
Operating Cash Flow
$117.00B▲
$31.0M▼
—
Net Income
$101.46B▲
$11.4M▼
—
Current Ratio
1.00x▼
1.89x▲
—
Retained Earnings
$11.33B▲
$186.5M▼
—
Contagion Watch
Other tickers the Risk Sentinel just flagged
Is your portfolio hiding a toxic S-3?
Run any ticker through the same Risk Sentinel scan — free.
Educational analysis only. Not financial advice. Comparison uses cached SEC EDGAR data and may contain inaccuracies. AI systems are fallible. Always verify against primary filings on
SEC EDGAR
and consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.