Risk Comparison · Cached SEC Snapshots
AAPL vs FSLR — Structural Risk Comparison
AAPL
Apple Inc.
AA
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 100%
VS
FSLR
FIRST SOLAR, INC.
AAA
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 100%
STRUCTURAL RISK ANALYSIS · DETERMINISTIC
AAPL SHOWS HIGHER STRUCTURAL RISK
FSLR has 971.2 fewer months of cash runway (27.8 mo vs 999.0 mo).
METRIC
AAPL
FSLR
SPREAD
Doomsday Clock
999.0 mo▲
27.8 mo▼
971.2 mo
Dilution Risk
-1.8 / 100▲
0.2 / 100▼
2.0 pts
Altman Z-Score
2.27▼
7.34▲
5.07
Operating Cash Flow
$82.63B▲
-$359.8M▼
—
Net Income
$71.67B▲
$769.2M▼
—
Current Ratio
1.07x▼
2.52x▲
—
Retained Earnings
$12.36B▲
$7.56B▼
—
Contagion Watch
Other Technology names flagged for the same structural risk
Is your portfolio hiding a toxic S-3?
Run any ticker through the same Risk Sentinel scan — free.
Educational analysis only. Not financial advice. Comparison uses cached SEC EDGAR data and may contain inaccuracies. AI systems are fallible. Always verify against primary filings on
SEC EDGAR
and consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.