Risk Comparison · Cached SEC Snapshots
AAPL vs FRST — Structural Risk Comparison
AAPL
Apple Inc.
AA
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 75%
VS
FRST
Primis Financial Corp.
BB
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 32%
STRUCTURAL RISK ANALYSIS · DETERMINISTIC
FRST SHOWS HIGHER STRUCTURAL RISK
FRST has 963.7 fewer months of cash runway (35.3 mo vs 999.0 mo).
METRIC
AAPL
FRST
SPREAD
Doomsday Clock
999.0 mo▲
35.3 mo▼
963.7 mo
Dilution Risk
-2.3 / 100▲
0.2 / 100▼
2.5 pts
Altman Z-Score
1.13▲
0.08▼
1.05
Operating Cash Flow
$53.92B▲
-$54.4M▼
—
Net Income
$42.10B▲
$7.3M▼
—
Current Ratio
N/A *
N/A *
—
Retained Earnings
-$2.18B▼
$114.4M▲
—
* Finance / Real Estate sectors do not report current assets
Educational analysis only. Not financial advice. Comparison uses cached SEC EDGAR data and may contain inaccuracies. AI systems are fallible. Always verify against primary filings on
SEC EDGAR
and consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.