Risk Comparison · Cached SEC Snapshots
AAPL vs FRST — Structural Risk Comparison
AAPL
Apple Inc.
AA
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 100%
VS
FRST
Primis Financial Corp.
C
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 22%
STRUCTURAL RISK ANALYSIS · DETERMINISTIC
FRST SHOWS HIGHER STRUCTURAL RISK
FRST has 990.4 fewer months of cash runway (8.6 mo vs 999.0 mo).
METRIC
AAPL
FRST
SPREAD
Doomsday Clock
999.0 mo▲
8.6 mo▼
990.4 mo
Dilution Risk
-1.8 / 100▲
0.2 / 100▼
2.0 pts
Altman Z-Score
2.27▲
0.08▼
2.19
Operating Cash Flow
$82.63B▲
-$54.4M▼
—
Net Income
$71.67B▲
$7.3M▼
—
Current Ratio
N/A *
N/A *
—
Retained Earnings
$12.36B▲
$114.4M▼
—
* Finance / Real Estate sectors do not report current assets
Contagion Watch
Other Technology names flagged for the same structural risk
Is your portfolio hiding a toxic S-3?
Run any ticker through the same Risk Sentinel scan — free.
Educational analysis only. Not financial advice. Comparison uses cached SEC EDGAR data and may contain inaccuracies. AI systems are fallible. Always verify against primary filings on
SEC EDGAR
and consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.