Risk Comparison · Cached SEC Snapshots
AAPL vs ATER — Structural Risk Comparison
AAPL
Apple Inc.
AA
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 100%
VS
ATER
Aterian, Inc.
C
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 0%
STRUCTURAL RISK ANALYSIS · DETERMINISTIC
ATER SHOWS HIGHER STRUCTURAL RISK
ATER has 980.3 fewer months of cash runway (18.7 mo vs 999.0 mo).
METRIC
AAPL
ATER
SPREAD
Doomsday Clock
999.0 mo▲
18.7 mo▼
980.3 mo
Dilution Risk
-1.8 / 100▲
23.7 / 100▼
25.5 pts
Altman Z-Score
2.27▲
-46.12▼
48.39
Operating Cash Flow
$82.63B▲
-$363K▼
—
Net Income
$71.67B▲
-$6.1M▼
—
Current Ratio
1.07x▼
1.70x▲
—
Retained Earnings
$12.36B▲
-$736.8M▼
—
Contagion Watch
Other Technology names flagged for the same structural risk
Is your portfolio hiding a toxic S-3?
Run any ticker through the same Risk Sentinel scan — free.
Educational analysis only. Not financial advice. Comparison uses cached SEC EDGAR data and may contain inaccuracies. AI systems are fallible. Always verify against primary filings on
SEC EDGAR
and consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.