Risk Comparison · Cached SEC Snapshots
AAPL vs ATEN — Structural Risk Comparison
AAPL
Apple Inc.
AAA
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 100%
VS
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
AA
MODERATE / CAUTION
Score: 88%
STRUCTURAL RISK ANALYSIS · DETERMINISTIC
ATEN SHOWS HIGHER STRUCTURAL RISK
ATEN has a lower Altman Z-Score (1.95 vs 2.66).
METRIC
AAPL
ATEN
SPREAD
Estimated Cash Runway
999.0 mo
999.0 mo
0.0 mo
Dilution Risk
-1.7 / 100▲
0.6 / 100▼
2.3 pts
Altman Z-Score
2.66▲
1.95▼
0.71
Operating Cash Flow
$117.00B▲
$31.3M▼
—
Net Income
$101.46B▲
$20.9M▼
—
Current Ratio
1.00x▼
1.29x▲
—
Retained Earnings
$11.33B▲
$22.7M▼
—
Contagion Watch
Other tickers the Risk Sentinel just flagged
Is your portfolio hiding a toxic S-3?
Run any ticker through the same Risk Sentinel scan — free.
Educational analysis only. Not financial advice. Comparison uses cached SEC EDGAR data and may contain inaccuracies. AI systems are fallible. Always verify against primary filings on
SEC EDGAR
and consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.